I think it’s pretty safe to say that the majority of us are here to avoid another corporate takeover of our preferred platforms. It would seem to me to be a tad irresponsible to allow Facebook into our space with open arms, allowing them to hoover up our data. I would love to keep using Lemmy.world, but will happily change instances if need be, and I feel many share that sentiment.

  • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I actually think this demonstrates the exact problem. The reason you can’t do that at the email level is because Google has taken over the entire email space. Ideally, we don’t let threads do that.

    Nowadays you have services like Outlook blocking emails Tutanota for “spam protection”. I’d really rather threads not get so big that they can start dictating how the Feduverse operates in that fashion.

    As I said down thread, the easiest way to get information with the structure of activity pub is to have a bunch of users and that is because the only way information gets transmitted to a server is by caching it based on post interactions.

    That is exactly what millions of thread users in the Fedeverse would accomplish.

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Would email be better if you couldn’t send/receive emails from people with Gmail accounts?

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It would objectively be more secure in terms of data privacy.

        Better, in that regard, is subjective. It sure wouldn’t be more convenient, but that’s why we left Reddit and came to Lemmy in the first place. It sure wasn’t because of convenience.

        • beetus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          objectively be more secure in terms of data privacy

          Please elaborate how email would be objectively more secure if you could block Gmail.

          You can already block Gmail today from any other provider by putting a filter on incoming @gmail addresses. How does that make email more secure?

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah I’m not going to criticize anyone for not liking Google. Google’s done plenty to sour people on them. But this is just the height of ignorant flailing.