Well, not quite. You’d have to have rights to the land to do that. Else someone could ride up and just take it from you.

So then it’s not worse?

If you do it for side money, you’re only accomplishing that by fucking someone else over. Otherwise you wouldn’t make money.

Through their paws for one, and when they lick their coats, the saliva acts like sweat and cools them down as it evaporates. And if it’s really bad, they pant.

That’s fair, and I might have gone more neutral than intended. I was just curious if that fit what was in your head more.

Would it be more fair to say: when the music kicks in, the story is being told?

I mean, there’s nothing strictly wrong with a picture of gore. If someone wants it for some reason, why not?

Assume I can’t draw the conclusions you want me to. Please explain it

Arguably any revolution comes from a critical mass of the population being unhappy…

Howso

Which would be better to you? You’re a civilian somewhere - do you prefer to watch your livelyhood slowly being destroyed by your government or do you want a boom?

I’d assume the former gives you a chance to recognize it and do something, the latter is just boom.

Isn’t that part of the point? If the populace suffers, government changes are more likely