What you’re asking is akin to: why are people impressed by the airplane? We’ve already reached the Americas and India by boat.

SpaceX, and others actually are not advancing science per se, but are greatly improving/optimising the engineering so that it can be used in cheaper ways by others.

There’s also the issue that after the moon landing we didn’t really improve that much and much of the knowledge faded

Sorry I’m not very eloquent and failed to explain myself:

What I see is that the requested “versions” don’t match when the request is made through jellyseer vs when made directly from one of the Arr.

I first noticed this when requesting through jellyseer and I’d see a file with very few peers. Then I’d do an interactive search in the respective Arr (by hand) and there were much better candidates

I’ll recheck but I think I have updated profiles

I’ll use this topic to ask a question about jellyseer if you don’t mind.

I have jellyfin, jellyseer and arr stack for my Linux ISOs. The issue is when one someone requests an ISO from jellyseer it never is the best choice in terms of peers. I can check this by doing interactive search on one of arr and seeing there was a better choice for the quality I setup. Perhaps I have some misconfiguration?

It depends on your needs. I have minis that cost <100$ and have others that cost 500$. My cheapest mini has currently 3TB of backups of my personal things, so it serves my needs very cheaply. I don’t need a GPU so it keeps the costs down.

This is per capita for sure

They are power and space efficient, and usually very quiet. That’s fascinating enough.

Hey man why the rudeness? We’re just trying to have a conversation …

You’re the one who mentioned 2013. My point in the original comment was about now. It wasn’t mentioned explicitly but I meant it

Yes really. You know how much I paid, initially, for Jellyfin, et al, and had them working in an afternoon?

Exactly, open source is always worth the extra effort, if any, to get things working. Contribute!