Absolutely, now it’s the standard but limited email storage space was rather standard.

But they also offered a really good product, especially when it came to spam filter compared with other email services at that time.

how can the Fediverse grow without loosing its soul in the process?

It can’t? Rather obvious that the “soul” of a community is defined by it’s members and the bigger the community the more mainstream this soul will become. Maybe the federation mechanic offers some solutions here, but that remains to be seen.

You need a drone to play it, than it’s kind of free for all.

Making children to pass down genes and the family name definitely fits that picture.

That’s a very metaphysical profit. Capitalism offers profit here and now.

On top of that you have the parents who have kids so someone can take care of them when they are older.

Developed capitalist countries are know for children taking care of their parents.

Alternative: capitalism is designed around egoism, having children does not really fit in that picture at all.

Kevin Spacey probably wasn’t acting as he often portrayed psychopathic characters in TV and films.

Good example, him “acting” bad guys kind of even gets an extra layer of morbid interest to the film. But I would totally understand other actors not wanting to work with him anymore. Have no idea who the other guys are.

I enjoy actors for their work as actors not for them being good people.

You are barking at the wrong tree. I’m all for folks bodily autonomy.

Nuance bad.

Sure, but there are some important nuances.

Pretty sure that the current construct of nations is not well equipped to face any of global challenges.

Some deep Sowjet lore right here.

It still has to be economically viable. Even if someone made one with good intentions, there’d still have to be a way to keep it afloat. How would you go about doing that?

There is a wide range between maximizing for profit and making a project viable.

I actually think that a good and popular dating app would theoretically solve that as the dating pool would be much larger.

On one hand, on the other people get more picky with more choice. Dating is not a technological but a societal issue.

Somebody really passionate about it has to make one and not sell it or make it publicly tradable? Which would be difficult since the market is rather full (I would guess). Also dating can be just a miserable experience if one lacks self esteem and does not fit into societal expectations of desirability - that’s not on dating app problem.

The problem, like with a lot of stuff, ist that they are for profit and optimized in a way to maximize profit over the actual functionality.

Nah, nobody can wreck my life better than me.

They forgot the /s, their customers won’t get the joke.

Sure if you chose to take the words literally - but that’s kind of the point of the whole conversation.

And you do make yourself an arbiter - the moment you say that someone is not a true Christian.

So why are you an arbiter of morality despite all what you say?

So you are not only arbiter on when life begins, cells are considered humans, but also on who is Christian and who not - for someone following Jesus you are really into judging.