:⁠^⁠)

is it the proof that no progress has been made or no information is public?

mixture of experts leads to no where and I know boltzmann brain but I can simply say, being a figment of someone’s imagination doesn’t decrease my pains and struggles, implying that my pain were the proof of my being, can be fictious but won’t change my reality

well, how? what issue would this particular solution give rise to?

but cant such system be built with open standards, run upon shared public infrastructure

well technically someone had to do it, humans can’t and in this game of poker only gods can intervene to save the day

that means I get the answer, the unfeasibility of the solution is not in itself, but rather in its deployment.

I understand and I think your last paragraph is very poetic! And I agree with you partially, but I think in certain cases, it’s better to find the one general case the solution fits to and add the edge cases as it grows.

But putting the question of model selection aside, do you think this system would be practical, theoretically of course?

what if it gets magically implemented by god and it is the absolute power, only power above the system would be that of the masses. No small group or individual get’s privilege above the computer program

absolutely agreed, the society wont let this system establish but let us assume it get’s established, my reasoning was, the chain of command would be simpler to see and everything would be transparent!

So first of all, What:

• Simple predicate logic
• who decides the logic? open standards anyone who has a point can draft a point or share their idea
• I know it will be hard, time consuming and very tedious, but it’s just an Idea, not like those in power would ever relinquish it so easily.

secondly, I have read about EU laws and it is very challenging but unlike that case, system implemented here would be very fluid, law’s validity period is determined by 2 things:

1. People’s choices
2. it’s relevance as decided by the system during polling Which would still not make this system very democratic in a sense but it would really just be distributed AI autocracy, at least the way I see it, its similar to local AI overlords ruling us.

I think there can be many more standards that can be implemented to keep the system bias proof and strongly ethical.

One tangential question I had was:

• If LLM’s logic is structural and derivable, even though complex then why aren’t algorithms and models tend towards rule based predictions like black scholes model and mdp, or am I just a newbie and hasn’t seen enough and I am out of my depth again