IDK, the National Museum of African American History serves fried chicken every day, so they don’t think there’s anything wrong with it.
IDK, the National Museum of African American History serves fried chicken every day, so they don’t think there’s anything wrong with it.
IDK why people are interpreting your question about the mechanics of everyone switching at the same time. It sounds to me like you’re asking more about the bigger picture problems it would solve with society, not whether the sudden change would be able to be handled by the banks. Is that what you’re looking for?
Moving to a credit union is a great idea. I did a long time ago and haven’t looked back.
There are some things they don’t offer, sure, but then for stuff like investments I use dedicated platforms for those which is a better experience anyway.
In the grand scheme of things, not paying taxes is also a pretty miniscule thing. The US funding for Israel is pretty big though. If they needed more weapons that your tax dollars would have paid for, I’d guess the tax dollars you paid in the US would go to the same place. I guess the alternative is to live in not-US and not-Israel. But either way, I think the US would just fork up more money anyway.
But the main point I’m making is, bad people will find a way to do bad things. The best way to eliminate bad people is to change their minds.
Ultimately a society is composed of many individuals. We all play a small part in its change.
If you send them the message in plain text they have no way of verifying you aren’t just making it up to get someone you don’t like banned. Keeping it encrypted means they know the sender wrote it.
If it’s with asymmetric encryption, wouldn’t it be possible for the report button to generate a key based on their private key which can only be used to decrypt the given message?
https://www.mintmobile.com/plans/
All plans include unlimited talk and text.
It’s worth it for me and a lot of other people.
Email already has a To: field. There’s no point in writing it in the body.
A professional email would be the same as an informal one. Start with “Hello!” or “Good morning!”.
I believe Java is the best option for this type of application
Why?
Rust’s speed is a cherry on top. The main reason to use it is its language design / correctness guarantees.
I’ve been programming for several decades and understand nuance and subjectivity vs objectivity when it comes to this, and strongly believe Rust is just objectively much better than Java as a language.
One example is that Rust doesn’t have null while Java does. The creator of null gave an excellent talk called The Billion Dollar Mistake about why null was such a bad idea, and said languages shouldn’t not have used it. Instead, the alternative he gives is what Rust does.
Things like this are actually hugely important.
Also, Rust was “most loved” language in the StackOverflow developer survey for eight years in a row for a reason.
Other than Sublinks, I have never seen anyone post about how they really want to work with Java.
To add to this, a few minutes of searching would hopefully surface FreeTaxUSA.com. Don’t need to know shit and it’s free.
Did they need to do any other treatment for the tumor? No chemo or anything?
Fool is a spectrum. E.g. take the saying “fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me”. It’s possible to fool anyone. Sometimes it’s because they are a fool, but sometimes it’s not.
What about static IP address?
Someone recently told me that they sometimes feel gaslighted around me because I effortlessly make them question their beliefs and feelings
That says more about them than about you. An intelligent, stable adult shouldn’t be able to be so easily affected, even if they were in a room with Hannibal Lecter.
I’ve always been quite critical of myself
Lots of people are. That’s a good thing, as long as it’s constructive criticism. Sometimes it can go overboard and become unhealthy.
don’t consider myself a very nice person
Yeah that’s not great. You should be nice.
I have very strong morals
Then I think you’re not a psychopath.
However, this includes things like not lying, which means I always speak the truth, even if not everyone likes hearing it. I don’t conform to many social norms expected of me
That’s great! I wish more people in the world were like this.
However, it’s also important to say things in a respectful way. That doesn’t mean beating around the bush or sugar coating anything. It just means take their feelings into account.
E.g. if someone asks you if they are good at their job, and the truth is they suck, don’t say “no, you suck” (unless they deserve it). Say “there’s room for improvement. You can get there by working on x, y, and z.” The latter is constructive and gives them a bit of light at the end of the tunnel. In a way, that is more truthful than no light at all. Everyone can improve and change and better themselves, and it’s important to remind others (and yourself) of that.
Not conforming to society is great. I wish fewer people conformed.
But I can’t help but wonder why they don’t see me as I see myself
No one can do that but you.
I worry that I’m hiding the true me so well that people don’t actually like me, but rather the facade I unknowingly maintain
That’s called being an adult. As a child, we aren’t required to regulate our emotions, or enter complicated relationships with others. Life is full of tradeoffs, and after enough of them, even if you always make the best choices, you’ll still be far from where you felt when you started. We’re all strangers in foreign lands after a while. That doesn’t make you a psychopath; it makes you human.
I think the point is this is paradoxical. Everything must be proven by facts and we cannot trust any general, abstract statement of its own accord, then how can we prove “everything must be proven by facts and we cannot trust any general, abstract statement of its own accord”? What if that’s a wrong assumption?
Maybe the truth is we don’t always need to rely on observable facts, but we don’t know that because we’re making the aforementioned assumption without having any proof that it’s correct.
Java is horrible. And Lemmy is open source. We could just fork it and have the best of both worlds.
I’m not understanding. With Matrix you get channels like “Rust” where you join and it’s all about the Rust programming language. Or you can have a group chat with a few people in it.