what E2EE options are available
both Tuta and Proton rely on their own apps, and don’t necessarily integrate well with all operating systems.
If you’re looking for options that are both E2EE and also use open standards for integrations, you’re not going to have any luck.
Could you tell me what URL you are using? I used https://www.youtube.com/feeds/videos.xml?channel_id=UCrjKdwxaQMSV_NDywgKXVmw which is the channel in the screenshot but it’s throwing errors, as is w3 feed validator.
That fixed it, thanks.
Just broke my entire install, thanks.
It’s not only possible, its what lots of browsers have been doing for years. That and just randomizing non-essential data points like system fonts, languages and operating systems.
You are truly hopeless to understand.
The copy is created after the downloader originates the request. The uploader isn’t just manufacturing copies for no reason. The process requires 2 parties.
Show me a law relevant to this case that makes downloading an infringement.
The law is called the DMCA but you’re clearly using some sort of mental gymnastics to argue that the act of piracy is not making a copy of copyrighted material, which is factually and legally incorrect.
The UPLOADER is the only one with the capability of transferring the data.
You don’t seem to understand that there are 2 machines required to make a transfer. One uploads. One downloads. The two together make a copy. A machine cannot upload into the ether.
It seems the readers have spoken.
Actively pursuing content is perfectly lawful.
You seem intent on repeatedly misrepresenting the situation so this conversation is clearly going nowhere.
There is no legal prohibition against asking someone for a copy of a work
No one asked for a copy, they just took it.
nor is there a prohibition against receiving a copy, even if that copy was illegally produced and/or illegally distributed.
They didn’t “receive” a copy. No one dropped a hard drive off on their doorstep. They actively pursued the content and made a copy without permission for profit.
If you want to say they did something illegal, you have to argue that they were somehow in collusion with the uploader
Making a copy of copyrighted content without permission is illegal.
Edit: Downvotes? In a piracy community?
Piracy community can’t be interested in facts?
the company clarifies that there is nothing ‘independently illegal’ about torrenting.
Ah yes, I’m sure this strawman defense will hold up well for them in court.
If you see anything…that could be improved, the best option is to make that improvement yourself.
Are you under the impression that just everyone is a web developer?
Besides it would be impossible to reach an agreement who this default instance should federate with or how exactly it should be moderated.
If I may make a proposition: You can look at how Pixelfed allows certain instances that meet certain standards to opt into being listed in the app for discovery, all electronically. My recommendation would be to have 2 choices for users on sign-up:
People can’t seem to make up their minds if it matters which instance you join. I really don’t think it does.
The way Twitter works can be traced back to the very early days of the internet and it was just never updated because…reasons.
As for Mastodon…I can’t explain that one.
I honestly don’t understand it, that’s why I said “seems to support”, but thanks for the clarification.
I haven’t come across any limitations. Been using it for years. Plex became trash around the time they started forcing streaming channels into the feed and sharing my watch history without my consent.
Sharkey seems to support hosting blogs (pages) directly on the platform itself.
That assumes he wouldn’t have been prosecuted for the same thing today…
Been using Firefox forks for years.