Ultimately it gets to the point of, is the risk higher than the risk of money in a bank account.
Given that (at least in the us) money sitting in a checking account is 100% risk with guaranteed negative returns (over time inflation will outpace interest), there are investments that can generally be considered safer (bonds, tbills, etc) than just holding dollar bills.
This is a bad outlook, there are plenty of low risk investment strategies that are meant as income generation, and it’s generally what you should switch to as you start needing to cash in on your savings, these are things like laddered tbills and dividend stocks.
You can go slightly riskier doing things like wheeling options if your tolerance is higher.
Investment profiles differ for a reason and the term of the investment is just part of the strategy.
I should add that ‘buy and hold’ does not make something not a gamble.
If I told you I bought a random crypto currency or penny stock with no future or fundamentals and plan to hold on to it for 10 years because I just know it’s gonna hit big, would you not consider that a gamble?
For most things you throw away, you can maybe get 50 cents at the a scrapper, of they even take the item
Nothing is free. Equipment costs money and time to build, operate, maintain, and repair.
He is a Doctor Of Philosophy in Philosophy?
All PhDs are philosophy degrees.
A) the three laws were devised by a fiction author writing fiction. B) video game NPCs aren’t ai either but nobody was up in arms about using the nomenclature for that. C) humans hallucinate fake information, ignore directions and restrictions, and spread false information based on unreliable training data also ( like reading everything that comes across a Facebook feed)
Ok, so then the owner isn’t paying property tax.
In reality, the renter is not actually paying the property tax. They may be paying for it, but they are not the one paying the bill at the end of the year.
Edit: classic lemmy. The renter may be giving money to the landlord which covers the cost of the tax, however that is irrelevant. a renter by definition, does not own the property and therefore does not pay property taxes and yet, still is able to utilize public infrastructure. Just like how a person who doesn’t have income is still able to use public infrastructure. Your ability to pay into the system does not preclude you from participating.
There are a lot of people who don’t pay properly tax and get all of those services, for example, people who rent.
You still pay income tax and sales tax.
It’s possible to deadname any person who changed their name for any reason.
What do you mean? They didn’t actually navigate through the time dimension?
You mean the didn’t actually generate a 1000 foot wave?
Next your gonna tell me they didn’t even fly a space ship.
I’m inclined to agree, but it’s really just semantic differences. If they really wanted to, they could just release a new major version upgrade every year, tie the license to that version, and still get an effective annual subscription.
I think the retired folks actually made them a millionaire.
Don’t call me if I retire.
In the us, there are very rare cases where someone’s income straddles the line between benefits with a higher value than the increased income. This is not one of those cases, and it effectively only applies to people are below the poverty line and gain only a few hundred dollars in income.
For most small companies that break big, they want to use the new resource to make more stuff, because most of these types of companies are in creative industries. Then when those things aren’t also breakout successes, they get saddled with extra staff and costs and spend up in the machine.
10 million yen is only 60k usd, that’s a big bonus but not nearly as staggering as your comment implies.
This is right wing rhetoric meant to convince people that cuts to social programs are needed as a way to make social services solvent, fyi.
Social security is funded by the current tax payers, taxes were raised so that the social security could have some extra money to buy us bonds, allowing them to cash in those bonds later when boomers retire en masse. Eventually the bonds will be gone and social security will be ‘insolvent’ but this is ok! Social security is always being paid into and social security can be paid out with general funds, or by increased tax rates, or by increasing the cap on SS taxes.
There is not actually any indication that social security is going anywhere other than Republican fear mongering.
It’s also just not at all the same thing.
An aircraft mechanic can’t just go out on his five minute break and smoke a j and go back to it.
A smartphone is just a gateway to a VM with unlimited storage and processing power.
https://youtu.be/uRB7iUCX4KQ?si=4tJcrjmnaSSRfdyf
This video does a great job explaining how it works.
It has to do with system calls for stopping the disc that multi disc games would use.
Edit: I’m a dummy and didn’t realize this video was posted in the op.
My mango is, to blow up, then act like I don’t know nobody, ahahahahahaha