To not answer questions put to you after you pretend to be a master debater.

not answering questions, especially loaded or irrelevant ones, is a great debate strategy.

edit:

while i think they are picking a semantic fight about a topic on which they are not prepare to engage, your engagement has been kind of shitty toward them, too. i think you could be better and still show that they are silly and ignorant of the topic.

nazis aren’t fish. i don’t care to convert them. i want to drive the back under the rock they crawled from under.

Israel props them up

if i elect an average right wing conservative (which is redundant) and they go on to do bad things, which is practically guaranteed, I would not feel better.

i couldn’t do that.

but what happens if you vote for someone and they end up winning?

i’m open to the possibility that you’re right, but my experience is that criticism of the cia or zionism is tolerated to a much greater degree on .world than criticism of china or soviet russia is tolerated on .ml.

can you point to specific instance-wide bannings for talking shit on us foreign policy or zionism?

and for the right reasons