If this starts to happen, turn it around before it slides too much and start biting from the other side instead. Usually does the trick!

See here’s the controversial take. I don’t agree with you at all. It was literally built up for the entire series and was the only natural conclusion. She was literally saying “I plan to break the wheel” from the start. That is not language a peaceful person uses. Her goals to begin with were those of a conqueror, and what we got was the natural end of that ambition when it crashes into reality.

I think it was done beautifully, and the fact so many people bought into her side of things and felt betrayed is evidence of how well done it was.

While there were some truly awful moments in the last season of game of thrones, danaerys’ arc was not one of them. Her going nuts was hinted at from the beginning and I wouldn’t have had it any other way.

🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨this post brought to you by yellow gang

Is there a way to migrate a Lemmy account to it?

That does sound quite nice actually

I’ve always been the type of player who, when the game says “there’s no way we can beat them all, we should sneak past”, decides “let’s test that theory”.

Whatever they were designed for, they are currently being sold as the solution to nearly every problem. You can’t expect a layperson to look further than that, and it’s completely reasonable to judge what they do against the claims being used to sell them.

You can blame the marketing departments, but that original purpose you mention is no longer a major talking point (even if it should be).

Simple to say, not so simple to do. I’d love to honestly.

Nah we’re trying to get away from it, too.

I’m not enough of an expert to explain it better, but I remember reading about a guy who came on board with google, and took over search. He had an initiative to keep people on google longer. That’s my memory of it at least.

In the case of google they purposely made it worse so that people spent more time on their site rather than other sites. This means they see more ads from google as opposed to ads on another website. They’ve just doubled down on this with AI summaries, too. Now they just blatantly take content from websites so you don’t have to go to the website that made it at all.

I guess it’s not surprising that this is also a google thing, but gmail’s. No matter what I type in it shows me my entire inbox practically. It’s so fuzzy it’s completely useless.

I guess I don’t know it. Oh well! I worked for Alphagraphics.

Which one was it out of curiosity? I also used to work in print in Seattle

I don’t really understand how it would be, since things get duplicated across any federated instances. If anything it amplifies the spam since it auto-dupes it everywhere.

You might say everyone could just defederate, but at that point the damage is done, no? Not to mention if they’re using bot armies they can just send them at any new instances that spin up.

Someone please let me know if I’m wrong, but I don’t see how Lemmy could withstand any amount or coordinated cyber attack or operation.

If dedicated security teams from fortune 500 companies can’t beat them, I don’t see how someone’s server in their garage is going to do it.

That third one definitely seems the most fun at a glance!

To login on different accounts I just make a private tab. Never tried the multi account thing you’re talking about.

The problem with trying to police the output is there isn’t a surefire way to detect the fact it’s generated. That’s why I prefer targeting the companies who created the problematic models.