Decoy321

Explain

Probably as “inconspicuous” storage. If you’ve got a bunch of other garden gnomes around, this’ll look just like one of them.

Is it a clever idea? Did it work? Well, we’re reading about it…

Thanks. I know, I was just making a silly joke.

I dunno, man. None of these monkeys are Andy Serkis.

… Rain Man?!?

You should try a healthier hobby, like heroin.

The shingles wouldn’t have stayed over the hole well enough

Rest in peace, Hvaldimir, you magnificent mammal.

Not entirely true. While the heat is doing the real heavy lifting, the water as a medium does transfer stuff out of the meat. That’s why boiled meat tastes like shit.

Good ol 77. Truly the best vault.

You want a toe? I can get you a toe, believe me. There are ways, Dude. You don’t wanna know about it, believe me. Hell, I can get you a toe by 3 o’clock this afternoon… with nail polish.

Fun hyperbole, but this all assumes wolves are the only predators.

Nah it’s still the wolf’s fault, even when the shepherd is terrible. Take the wolf out of the equation, and the sheep live regardless of the shepherd’s capabilities.

I do. It’s the last one.

Meet SAM, the bricklaying robot.

Boooooooo.

I dunno, my dude. That’s still quite a reach to go from a simple question to automatically determining that it’s a hatchet job.

I’m not saying you’re wrong, just that you’re assuming a lot more than I normally works from a singular question.

There’s a significant difference between the two questions in your first sentence: quality of verifiability. The goal here is to determine accuracy anyways. Asking that directly will never get you an answer that you should accept at face value.

If I ask “is this accurate?”, any sourceless responses lack weight. “yes” holds as much proof as “no.”

But “has anyone heard of this” is a much lower barrier of veracity. Answers themselves won’t determine the accuracy of the article, just whether or not anyone can help establish credibility.

It’s important to question and verify sources, no matter who it is. Criticizing someone who does makes you no better than anyone pushing propaganda.

What is a problem is fake news.

Indeed. That’s why that user asked the simple question. They’re trying to determine the veracity of the information from that website.

Bias and factuality are different concepts. One source can print wildly biased, yet probably true information. While another can provide absolutely unbiased disinformation.

Yes, Tom. Horrible.

Bambi fucked everyone up at that age.