I’ve gotten a comment in my annual review, but I don’t think it impacted by bottom line score. And tbf, I was swearing in front of clients, in an industry where a bit more professionalism is the norm.

I kind of like the symbol, so long as it’s used as a symbol. The problem is it doesn’t really make sense in the headline; imagine if we inserted a bird symbol before the word Twitter or the little space dude before reddit.

Hello from Lemmy! Can you see this or do I need to @ you?

And we see the post, but I don’t think it has a title.

Eta: @[email protected]?

Edit2: it’s a title now!

That sounds like it punishes small instances… a lot. What would starting an instance look like? Do you start with a huge list of servers to inspect and approve?

Tbh I’m struggling to imagine what this would look like in something like Lemmy. It seems to be describing an extreme form of setting your account to private, but this only really makes sense in a situation where you have followers who are friends and family. How would I decide who to “approve”?

Oh you’re right, I read that as 490,000, sorry. Thanks

OK, but what arithmetic?

Where did those numbers come from? MAU/users ismore like 25%?

I think these are great rules, so long as they never have any teeth.

That’s really the entire article. “Yeah, for now its run by hippies who care about privacy and run servers out of a sense of civic duty, but we can fix that”

I mean, they’re doable, but they’re cultural goals, not technical ones.

I’d argue that really all of these are on a spectrum between the two though.