Very unlikely. Keith is pandering to the right on this issue.

Thanks for asking about split on 18! I assumed it was about not trying to marry your highschool sweetheart or something!

It reads very normally for a minor interest story in the UK.

With the recent publicity of LLM generated papers, would there be any strength of this platform to reject garbage science?

You confident that blue Labour will reverse this policy?

Sounds like a man who needs paternity leave.

Reflective practice. You need to actually carry out all the actions needed for a scenario, then afterwards go back over how it went and plan for improvement.

That’s how we do it in hospitals, except the scenarios are real.

Those concepts aren’t exclusive to computers. Why do you think red triangles are used in road signs, or handles are only on one side of doors that open in one direction?

So UI and design

That’s an unfortunate lesson to learn in childhood.

There are good people out there, but even the best aren’t perfect. The good people will recognise when they slip up however, and try to make good on it somehow.

What a precocious child you must have been

Related concept: buy twice. Buy cheap the first time. If you use it enough to break it then buy a higher quality option.

So far the buy cheap options haven’t broken, so…

Vital eh?

I’d forgotten that I ought to be dead.

I was definitely thinking of a hypothetical golf course; I’m not under any illusions that the vast majority are biodiversity deserts.

Not for the same resource input it doesn’t.

Debatable. Depending on the golf course location and management, there could be an argument for them at least providing some space for biodiversity.

Tobacco doesn’t produce as much of use, but also doesn’t come with the same methane emissions, or slurry runoff.

Quite the reverse in fact! Livestock produces fewer calories and nutrients per square meter than crops.

Sorry for not being clear; that was the point I was trying to make.

And livestock

UK: furiously scribbling notes