From 4chan

  • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    14 days ago

    And the puritans thought the same was equally clear about bare ankles, your arbitrary standard of which visible body parts are normal vs sexual is just as dumb as theirs was. The only things humans do that are inherently sexual are actual sexual behaviors. Clothing is not fucking, nudity is not fucking.

    • PhilMcGraw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’m not equating what she is wearing to “fucking”, but you’re talking as if it’s clearly some “oh this just feels comfortable” cosplay and not intentionally sexualised. Sexual attraction arousal and flirting starts before “fucking”.

      • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        14 days ago

        There is nothing inherently sexual about it, clothing isn’t flirting, your arousal is your own problem

    • ronl2k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Homo-sapiens have been on earth for about 250k years, and have been wearing clothes for only 100k years, after one of the severe ice ages that even affected Africa. We made nudity sexual.