• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I mean, if the alternative is vanilla Chrome, it hardly matters at this point. They’re both so loaded with tracking your computer will dent the floor, and they have basically the same capabilities.


    Obviously FF is better, but what I’m saying is, statistically, for the vast majority, this is only pulling folks off of Chrome.

    • titanicx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      I mean it goes back and forth so much. I remember when Firefox was the king of browsers 15 years maybe 18 years ago. It then got so loaded with shit that Chrome was the only way to go for about 10 years or so now at this point I think it’s pretty much a wash between the two. If nothing else you can use a lighter browser. I personally prefer Chrome because then I can use it on my phone my tablet my computer and have access to all of my tabs as access to all of my searches everything between the three devices.

      • hdsrob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        14 days ago

        because then I can use it on my phone my tablet my computer and have access to all of my tabs as access to all of my searches everything between the three devices.

        You can do that with Firefox. If you use Android you can also run uBlock in the mobile version of Firefox, which is why I’ll never use Chrome again.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        What I meant is there are tons of alternatives to Google-branded Chrome, that are basically Chrome underneath but at least stripped out. Including ones with browser sync across devices.

        I am using DuckDuckGo for mobile/desktop sync at the moment. But mostly Cromite (or Firefox) on desktop, and only because Cromite sadly isnt available on iOS.

        It’s not a wash anymore though, it’s not even close. Plain Chrome tracks you so much it definitely eats CPU doing so, no matter how many extensions you install.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I remember my Firefox browser got hijacked so badly, that I had to never install it again on one of my computers, because it would pick up the extension I guess that was left behind in app data or something? Anyway, I was afraid to touch it, long after it was cleared.

      • Johanno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        Why though?

        I mean the only reason I could think of is that the number of sites which do not support Firefox increases. So I always need Chrome to get some websites working.

        What did Firefox that Vivaldi does better?

        • Cevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          What did Firefox that Vivaldi does better?

          So far:

          • No AI slop
          • Lower CPU usage
          • Broader set of extensions (old Chrome + Chrome V3 both supported)
          • Nicer interface with actually configurable sidebar
          • Configurable keybinds for everything
          • Mouse gestures

          But as I say, I’ve only been trying it for a few days, and there are several others I want to try before I settle on a permanent replacement.