I found about Usenet and the sort of “hype” relative to it and I wonder some stuff.

Maybe I’m a bit old school but is this process not against the spirit of piracy,

  • be generous to share
  • fight against censorship and DCMA takedown
  • work in a decentralized way

Just wondered it, if someone wants to give his opinion

    • foremanguy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      In the way of piracy (maybe I missed it but Usenet piracy is new for me)

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, you missed it. It isn’t new at all. Piracy on Usenet predates Napster, and as pointed out probably predates the Web.

        • foremanguy@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I am wrong but you need to use usenet providers to download stuff right? So it’s centralized and company based?

            • Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Replying to this before OP asks.

              Usenet is distributed across hundreds (thousands maybe?) of servers. It’s centralized in that setting up your own server and getting the same access as joining an existing Usenet server is going to be very difficult (and with Usenet being used for privacy more and more, could be impossible due to admins not trusting a random new person), but in theory one could.

              • johnwicksdog@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                4 days ago

                With modern Usenet there are about 8 or so backbones used for file sharing. Your Usenet provider/server would connect to one or more of these backbones.

                Its true Usenet is designed for federation, and in the 80s and 90s it was thousands of servers but today commercial Usenet providers just resell these 8 backbones.

              • WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 days ago

                Usenet has splintered into text and piracy. Text is low volume and many servers can peer with yours for free. Piracy is more centralized, gets spammed like half a petabyte every day, we know that because 99% of “the posts” never get downloaded even once, it’s commercial because of the huge storage requirements.

      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 days ago

        It is not new. I downloaded (copyrighted) porn movies from my ISP’s own Usenet servers in the early 90s. On dialup. It was a decentralized, federated service before anybody even knew what decentralization or federation even meant or why they would want it. It was just assumed that everyone would want to run their own Usenet servers because the technologies of the time didn’t allow direct, continuous, real-time connection between everybody. Sharing was expensive but running a Usenet server was relatively cheap and was a good way to share all that data to all of an ISP’s users at once. It was ALWAYS an option to use it for piracy, and people did.

        Nowadays, sharing is cheap, and running Usenet servers is expensive, so almost nobody runs their own Usenet servers, especially not ISPs. But that’s not the technology’s fault, it’s just the way the world has changed. The internet is a very different place now, and we use it in different ways. Usenet, on the other hand, has not changed at all. Only the people using it have changed.