• Da Cap’n@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I like the EFF, but I’m very suspicious of them claiming any meta apps provide actual encryption. I assume their “encryption “ is simply show.

    • Whooping_Seal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I for some reason recall at one point WhatsApp’s encryption was actually an audited implementation of Signal’s encryption. But that is so long ago that I doubt that holds much weight now ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Even it they (WhatsApp) still provide reliable E2EE, they have lots of metadata that is not encrypted, and that they actively share with their “advertising partners”.

    • Nursery2787@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      End to end encryption provided by a corporation isn’t for show. Instead of a dump with everybody’s conversations, now a cop has to physically pay a visit and take the phone.

      This doesn’t help you when you are targeted, but at the population level this has actual effects of cops having to have to do their jobs.

      Many people see it as theatre. I see it as a lot better than just keeping everything in plaintext.