If piracy is moral and ethical and enables us to share knowledge, why do private trackers gatekeep this knowledge? It goes against the principles of piracy. Do they do it just to feel superior about bring in a sekrit club?

  • NeryK@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would say it is more of a practical consideration. Private trackers generally enforce upload/download ratios. This ensures the health of the sharing pool stays good.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also, they curate the collection so that it doesn’t get filled with low quality garbage.

      Part of preserving and sharing knowledge is doing quality control.

      • Fedora@lemmy.haigner.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They’re talking about the good seeder to leecher ratio on private trackers, compared to the poor seeder to leecher ratio on public trackers. You and a couple of others might be good seeders on public trackers, but the majority aren’t. Private trackers try to filter out leechers.

      • Yote.zip@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        1 year ago

        Usually torrents remain seeded because private tracker users are encouraged to seed everything forever. In addition, often if a private tracker has a bonus system they will offer extra bonus points for seeding low-seed torrents, and some even automatically mark torrents as freeleech if they’re below ~5 seeds, encouraging people to revive its seed count in a targeted manner.