TheHolm@aussie.zone to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoAMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose'www.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up1418arrow-down119file-text
arrow-up1399arrow-down1external-linkAMD won't patch all chips affected by severe data theft vulnerability — Ryzen 3000, 2000, and 1000 will not get patched for 'Sinkclose'www.tomshardware.comTheHolm@aussie.zone to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square146fedilinkfile-text
Here we are - 3600 which was still under manufacture 2-3 years ago are not get patched. Shame on you AMD, if it is true.
minus-squareconciselyverbose@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoValue is absolutely not arbitrary. “Reasonable” means comparable with x86/ARM at the same performance level. Anything more is, by definition, not capable of being reasonably priced. You’re again advocating for an imaginary investment in a bad product.
minus-squarehaui@lemmy.giftedmc.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoYeah no. Forget it. We‘re not speaking the same language.
minus-squareChakravanti@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoClearly. There’s no language for sucking corporate three-letter cocks anyway.
Value is absolutely not arbitrary.
“Reasonable” means comparable with x86/ARM at the same performance level. Anything more is, by definition, not capable of being reasonably priced.
You’re again advocating for an imaginary investment in a bad product.
Yeah no. Forget it. We‘re not speaking the same language.
Clearly. There’s no language for sucking corporate three-letter cocks anyway.