Can someone who speaks sovcit interpret please? I can usually follow their “arguments” to some degree, but I’m completely lost with this one.
I read it that they’re trying to say: A company you owe money to won’t be able to claim that debt from you, unless you issue them some sort of notice to allow that. And then that company somehow owes something back to you, plus interest.
But I also assumed they’re misusing the terms creditor and debtor.
Saddest part of sovcitizenry is it usually starts when someone is in a legal and/or financial bind and meet a grifter who tells them there’s a secret second system that will make their problems go away if they just say the right magic words (which is partially true. In most legal and financial challenges you have routes you can take to get out of them with the least amount of pain, and both mean sending the right paperwork to the right person at the right time, and usually including the right payments as well) but these grifters cause the poor souls to dig themselves in deeper so that they end up in a mountain of increasingly difficult to manage trouble whereas they previously just had a molehill that they needed someone to help them find the right solution to manage