• Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    You’re missing the point when people say it won’t solve future issues. Yes, lock the perpetrator up (ignoring the issues with the penal system in the first place), that’s a no brainier. But locking up that person and placing all the blame at their feet doesn’t do anything for the other people in very similar situations.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The person you were talking to was making a broader societal point. Placing the blame for this whole situation, which is the fruit of many of the failings of society, just enacted through a single man, and saying we’re good 'cause that boogeyman is dead or in prison does NOTHING to address the root causes, the actual problems. That’s the point you’re missing.

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            You’re painting a false dichotomy, though. Both of these things can be true at the same time, and in fact are. It does everyone more good to accept that yes, Cruz did a bad thing and should be held accountable, and to accept that, yes, society at large has a hand to play in this.

              • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                What, exactly, prevents both from being true? Cruz is to blame for his actions. Society is to blame for the conditions that led to the actions. They’re both true. We can punish, imprison, whatever, the person who did the crime, while still also acknowledging that there may be other things that led to the thing from happening.