There is a lot of disinformation flying around about this. The original myth about Cass “dismissing 98% of all data” started because an activist on twitter read the wrong paper.
Question everything, especially if it agrees with you.
There is a lot of disinformation flying around about this. The original myth about Cass “dismissing 98% of all data” started because an activist on twitter read the wrong paper.
Question everything, especially if it agrees with you.
“Cis-supremacy in the UK’s approach to healthcare”
Yes that sounds quite scientific doesn’t it. Published a whole month before the Cass review was, brilliant prescience you must agree?
An arts degree and a business doctorate do not a qualified person make.
Do you know how systematic reviews work?