From the article:

The man is blaming the automaker even though the manual door opener was under his left hand the whole time.

A man in Arizona says that he was recently trapped in his Tesla after getting in, closing the door, and then realizing that his battery was dead. What he didn’t know is that the manual release for the door was under his left hand the whole time. Now, he’s blaming the automaker and raising awareness.

Rick Meggison, 73, says that Tesla needs to address what he calls a “safety concern” involving how to exit the car when the battery dies. The main door latch actuator on all Tesla models is electronic so if the 12-volt battery dies it won’t work. To ensure safe exit of the vehicle Tesla includes a manual release. Meggison didn’t know about that and ended up trapped in his car for 20 minutes on a hot day.

“I couldn’t open the doors. I couldn’t lower the windows. The computer was dead, so I couldn’t open the glove box. I couldn’t open anything,” he told ABC7. Of course, he could’ve opened the door in about two seconds had he known that the manual release was just ahead of his window switches. His situation has many wondering who’s to blame in situations like this.

  • haych@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Controversial opinion, but anyone buying a car which is a giant death machine, should read the manual before driving it, especially when it’s an electric vehicle and things aren’t like normal cars.

    Now I dislike Tesla, but the manual release isn’t hard to find.

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re not wrong, but why is Tesla reinventing the door handle? Why does this need to be powered now? Seems like they’re fixing something that wasn’t broken.

      • Kushan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        On the outside, the door handles of a Tesla automatically recess when not in use, which reduces drag on the car and let’s it drive more efficiently (therefore giving you more range).

        Tesla does a lot of “reinventing for the sake of it” but in this one instance there is actually a reason for it.

        • CurseBunny [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wikipedia article concerning drag coefficients

          The drag coefficients of even the more recent Teslas are comparable to other vehicles that don’t use retracting door handles, even the GM EV1 from 1999 beats all the Teslas on the table in terms of drag reduction. The door handles may technically be a contributing factor towards their more favorable position on the list, but they’re certainly not necessary and don’t seem to be highly impactful. A large part of Tesla design philosophy and marketing is making their cars seem futuristic and highly advanced through things like motorized door handles and autopilot. Their primary goal is to provide a unique and pleasant user experience “out of the box” and their justification for things like the door handles retracting are almost certainly retroactive.

        • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The door handle in question is on the inside of the car. It doesn’t serve any engineering reason to be resigned other than for aesthetics.

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t provide a printed copy of the manual, it’s only on the computer. This makes it awkward to really read as you have to sit in the car. It also means that if the battery dies you cannot access it to even look up things like the manual door release.

    • 2ez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      When someone is panicking, the nonstandard design will really shine.

        • 2ez@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Have you read your car’s manual cover to cover?

          I hope you’re not responsible for designing products, because intuitive product design is important. Requiring a manual to understand a potentially life-saving feature of your vehicle, because the manufacturer chose form over function… listen to yourself.

          Here’s another great solution: don’t let your car battery die (/s)

          • haych@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, I have 2 cars, I’ve read both manuals.

            I’m not saying I agree with with the bad for handles, but manuals for a big death machine should be read anyway, and if he did he’d know how to open a door.

            • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I know this is 8 months old, but are you seriously arguing people should read a car’s manual to know how to open the door?

              Any door that requires the user to read a manual is a terrible design.

              • haych@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                You misunderstand. I’m saying every car owner should read the manual for their car. Buy a new car, read the manual, it contains a lot of useful information whether you drive a crappy Tesla or not.