• 018118055@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I will gladly take a position of moral superiority, because copyright has evolved from a very limited monopoly, intended to encourage creativity while balancing public access, into a licence for corporations to seek rent.

    So, call it stealing if you like, I will sleep well tonight regardless.

      • 018118055@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        9 months ago

        The only theft going on is the ongoing theft from the public domain, due to corruption of copyright law by special interests enabled by law for hire. Your analogy is irrelevant as the marginal cost of operating a park for an extra visitor is not zero.

      • Iamdanno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 months ago

        He didn’t take the movie/music from them. They still have it. It still exists on their tape/film/drive. If you are going to argue, at least argue in good faith, with words that mean what you are trying to say.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s like refusing to pay the $20 park entrance fee and then making your own copy of the park in your backyard. Is that stealing $20 from the park?

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean it’s still possibly copyright and/or trademark infringement, but…