Is ProtonVPN worth it?

@piracy

Got reminded of this while reading about ProtonMail. The reason I haven’t gotten into proper #piracy is that I don’t have a VPN for torrenting, and the reason I don’t have a VPN is that I don’t #torrent. So it would be nice if I got a good VPN while #degoogling myself.

Will ProtonVPN rat me out to Comcast? I know some VPNs don’t hide what you’re downloading from your ISP, for reasons I don’t fully understand.

  • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The whole reason you get a VPN for piracy is to stop you’re ISP from seeing what you are doing. It also allows you to easily unblock indexer websites. What you are suggesting isn’t a replacement for a VPN in anyway and is likeley to lead to you getting caught and potentially banned by you’re ISP.

    • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your ISP won’t ban you for visiting “piracy sites”. They’ll only care if they get a subpoena, which you’ll only get if you’re distributing copyrighted material.

    • solitude@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you were to decide to try Usenet, you install a program called SABnzbd (kind of like qBit, it downloads the files - no uploading, downloading only). It has an SSL connection enabled (Secure Sockets Layer, encryption-based internet security protocol). Even without a VPN, they may be able to see that you’re searching you’re indexers (on a program called Prowlarr - searching for a file to DL), but you’re ISP can’t see what you’re downloading on SABnzbd. I still use Mullvad, so I know they can’t see anything I’m doing in regards to searching or DL.

      • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t generally like being talked down to.

        It’s weird you’re recommending advanced tools like Prowlarr to someone without piracy experience. I have used other programs from the Servarr suite like Sonarr and Radarr with BitTorrent and found them to be generally more trouble than they are worth.

        • solitude@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t generally like being talked down to.

          No idea what you’re talking about. I was genuinely trying to provide advice and assistance.

          It’s weird you’re recommending advanced tools like Prowlarr to someone without piracy experience.

          How does someone try to teach and guide another person in more “advanced” things, without them taking it as though they’re being talked down to?

          You’ve had two people who’ve tried to help you now, because you’re comments are clearly coming from a perspective of a person “without piracy experience” (your words).

          You can see my other comments in here. I’m not talking down to anyone. I guess I’ll let you figure out the problem with using BitTorrent or uTorrent on you’re own. GL

          • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’ve had two people who’ve tried to help you now, because you’re comments are clearly coming from a perspective of a person “without piracy experience” (your words).

            My guy I probably have more experience with this than you do. I’ve been doing it for literally years. The only thing I haven’t used is usenet. I might one day but the only advantage I can see is more consistent download speed.

            No idea what you’re talking about. I was genuinely trying to provide advice and assistance.

            Really? You talk as if I have no understanding of basic computer terminology like SSL. Like I know these things are encrypted. If you didn’t realize this bittorrent protocol can also be encrypted. Dosen’t stop them seeing who you are connecting to. Since piracy websites are banned you would have a hard time even accessing them without a VPN. Even if they can’t see what you’re downloading specifically they can still see you are accessing a piracy website - imagine trying to use that defense in court.

            figure out the problem with using BitTorrent or uTorrent on you’re own

            I was refering to the proctol. You can just say bittorrent since it’s a protocol. I don’t use either of these clients specifically I mainly use qBittorrent.

            What problem are you even referring to?

            • solitude@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              My guy I probably have more experience with this than you do.

              Based on you’re comments in this thread, no.

              It’s weird you’re recommending advanced tools like Prowlarr to someone without piracy experience

              You said the quote above, not me. So which is it? You have more experience than me, or you’re “someone without piracy experience?”

              Really? You talk as if I have no understanding of basic computer terminology like SSL.

              How in the world would I know who you are and what your experience level is with SSL? I was simply providing a thorough answer to you or anyone else who would care to read it later. That’s all. Not everything is a personal jab at you and your fragile psyche. You’re being overly sensitive about a non-issue.

              imagine trying to use that defense in court.

              For the vast majority of people, that’s never going to happen. If that’s something that definitely can happen in your country (from just viewing a piracy website) then name your country in your comments so most people don’t get confused. Otherwise, you’re blowing it way out of proportion.

              I was refering to the proctol. You can just say bittorrent since it’s a protocol. I don’t use either of these clients specifically I mainly use qBittorrent.

              And this confusion is generally why most knowledgeable users talk about “torrenting” instead of naming the protocol, which is also the name of a torrent client that is widely used by newer & uninformed users.

              Looking at your post history, its clear you just like to argue. Maybe that’s why you thought I was talking down to you, because that’s something you try to do to other people. I came here to help. This conversation is over.

            • solitude@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              My guy I probably have more experience with this than you do.

              Based on you’re comments in this thread, no.

              It’s weird you’re recommending advanced tools like Prowlarr to someone without piracy experience

              You said the quote above, not me. So which is it? You have more experience than me, or you’re “someone without piracy experience?”

              Really? You talk as if I have no understanding of basic computer terminology like SSL.

              I have no idea who you are or what your experience level is, or anyone else who would care to read it later, so I was providing a thorough answer. That’s all. Not everything is a personal jab at you and your psyche.

              imagine trying to use that defense in court.

              For the vast majority of people, that’s never going to happen. If that’s something that definitely can happen in your country (from just viewing a piracy website) then name your country in your comments so most people don’t get confused. Otherwise, you’re blowing it way out of proportion.

              I was refering to the proctol. You can just say bittorrent since it’s a protocol. I don’t use either of these clients specifically I mainly use qBittorrent.

              And this confusion is generally why most advanced users talk about “torrenting” instead of naming the protocol, which is also the name of a torrent client that is widely used by newer & uninformed users.

              Looking at your post history, its clear you just like to argue. Maybe that’s why you thought I was talking down to you, because that’s something you try to do to other people. I came here to help. This conversation is over.

              • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You said the quote above, not me. So which is it? You have more experience than me, or your “someone without piracy experience?”

                I maybe didn’t make this clear. You assumed I didn’t have experience (I honestly think you maybe got me mixed up with someone else), and you recommended prowlarr based on that assumption. I have actually actually tried similar systems multiple times over with Radarr, Sonarr, Couchpotato, sickbeard, Jackett, and friends. I never had great luck with any of them and the infrastructure meant to support them like FreeNAS or UnRAID. That’s why I don’t want people recommending them especially to the inexperienced.

                I have no idea who you are or what your experience level is, or anyone else who would care to read it later, so I was providing a thorough answer. That’s all. Not everything is a personal jab at you and your psyche.

                Yet you keep trying to claim I don’t know what I am doing while never showing anything I have said to be incorrect. Maybe you weren’t meaning to offend but that’s exactly what you have been doing.

                • solitude@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I maybe didn’t make this clear. You assumed I didn’t have experience (I honestly think you maybe got me mixed up with someone else), and you recommended prowlarr based on that assumption.

                  1. There is no “maybe” about it. I think you’ve completely confused even yourself at this point. Go back and read my original comment.
                  2. I didn’t mix you up with someone else, I specifically replied to you.
                  3. I didn’t recommend Prowlarr, I specifically said SABnzbd. That’s the program with SSL, not Prowlarr. I think you’re the one mixing me up with someone else, possibly MonkCanatella.
                  4. I didn’t assume you don’t have any experience with Usenet. I was, and still am, 100% sure you do not have any experience with Usenet, which is why I specifically said “If you were to decide to try Usenet, you install a program called SABnzbd…” Are you now saying you do have experience with Usenet?

                  .

                  Yet you keep trying to claim I don’t know what I am doing while never showing anything I have said to be incorrect.

                  “My guy” (as you said to me), you’re showing it all yourself, doing all the work for me. Do you need a point-by-point map or diagram or something? I can’t make it any more clear to you, than you have already done for yourself. Sorry my guy, you’re going to have to work on your confusion, fragile psyche, and extreme sensitivity, all by yourself my guy.

                  • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I was, and still am, 100% sure you do not have any experience with Usenet

                    I never claimed to have experience with Usenet. I do have years of experience with piracy in general. I guess I didn’t make this clear enough.

                    I didn’t recommend Prowlarr, I specifically said SABnzbd. That’s the program with SSL, not Prowlarr. I think you’re the one mixing me up with someone else, possibly MonkCanatella.

                    Even without a VPN, they may be able to see that you’re searching you’re indexers (on a program called Prowlarr - searching for a file to DL)

                    Is this not a recommendation? It’s from the same comment you mentioned SABnzbd.

                    I also never said Prowlarr uses SSL before now. Though given many index sites use HTTPS it can in fact use SSL or TLS. It’s still not a criticism of anything I have said though cause they can still see which site you are accessing just not which file.

                    Sorry my guy, you’re going to have to work on your confusion, fragile psyche, and extreme sensitivity, all by yourself my guy.

                    I am not the one who is confused here. The thing about being sesitive is probably true. I generally don’t like it when people try to lecture to me about something (piracy) I have been doing for way longer than them. Honestly the fact you have to use ad hominem like this and then block someone isn’t good.