no lawmaker is pushing to have that fixed.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_Arbitration_Injustice_Repeal_Act
Was reintroduced several times, Passed the house once. Republicans keep killing it in committee.
There’s also the Justice for workers Act specifically for employer force arbitration, more recently
En tarro Tassadar
You’re not good at actually responding to what someone said, are you? Just complete nonsequiturs from you. At this point complaining about down votes gets you more down votes.
You’re not understanding context.
No one has disagreed with your height. Not sure how you managed to misinterpret that.
Do you reject reality and substitute your own?
Quite literally what you are doing by calling the exact average for a US male, short, just because it’s not freakishly tall like yourself. Some self awareness may be in order.
You’ve made it extra clear you’re still failing to comprehend all the words I said together. It’s unclear if that’s on purpose or you’re just slow.
There are places already without trees where meat can be grown…
That’s one way to not comprehend what I said, I guess.
They could also, I didn’t know … clean up their production processes and use alternative materials that aren’t as harmful. Exxon isn’t a good example of this, but there’s plenty of mega corps which can do this. But they won’t because our laws are structured in such a way that they are not Incentivized to do so.
And those CEOs flying their private jets for an hour are more harmful than me driving my car all year.
Sure, but like ~8 companies produce like 75% of the pollution. Their biggest con was shifting the responsibility to individuals to change their habits instead of forcing them to clean up their factories
Blatantly, no. Learn to read. Holy shit
You’re training yourself to ignore your alarms completely
The obscene concentration of wealth is bad for the stability of the country. The existence of billionaires is a policy failure. And there’s no world where they exist without them being able to influence politicians, rules against it or not. You can’t just exclude one of the biggest drawbacks of their existence from criticism
Billionaires are definitely a problem. Corrupt public servants are also a problem. We can admit there is more than one problem.
I don’t think outlawing the existence of stocks fixes things though.
You just reinvented a Co-Op.
However, at what level does this get enacted?
Does little Tommy’s summer lawn cutting “business” with his 3 neighbors as customers need an elected board in order to operate?
If I run a business and need a secretary to take care of some mundane things while I do the actual money making part of the business, doors that secretary suddenly get 50% vote over all decisions?
One full of toxic heavy metals.